www.web-kassa.com

Post Reply
web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

www.web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

Site URL: http://www.web-kassa.com
Scorecard: [url=http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/web-kassa.com t=_self]View scorecard[/url]

Introduction:
Hello!

Please objectively evaluate the site


Regards, Dmitry

Has privacy policy?
Owner said Yes

Has a way for users to contact site owners?
Owner said Yes

Whois Information:
http://whois.domaintools.com/web-kassa.com

Disclaimer:
This post was generated automatically. All information is as entered by the site owner.

web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Tue Oct 25, 2011 4:20 pm

As you can return for another polzhitelny rankings, if 100% of the potential customer or just leave the site after seeing a negative rating, or of solidarity put too negative assessment of?

It turns out that this is impossible in principle?

web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Tue Oct 25, 2011 10:19 pm

Link to Customer Agreement available at the bottom of the site

web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:02 am

1. Info domain is completely open;
2. Terms paragraph of privacy posted (see link at the bottom of the page);
3. Contact details of the owner housed (select from the top menu section WebMoney, and address of the exchange point - there is also posted on the mandatory exchange points for notification of risk);
4. Instant communication with the administration of user on the site are the ICQ, and Live Chat "service."

What else needs to be on site to review the rating in a positive way?

intratrust
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:07 am

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by intratrust » Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:17 am

There's a comment by "leofelix" saying:
moreover attempt to mapipulate WOT scorecard

as the following banned accounts show

http://www.mywot.com/user/1972885/comments

http://www.mywot.com/user/1972894/comments
http://www.mywot.com/user/1972941/comments
http://www.mywot.com/user/1972921/comments
http://www.mywot.com/user/1972915/comments

update: the owner tried again
http://www.mywot.com/en/user/2356362/comments "
What happened there?

web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:32 am

I first wrote his report, that of stupidity and ignorance tried to put his green rating (if it were not there). To do so, registered several accounts, put them in assessing and leave comments. For this and actually got a negative rating, blocking a vote for the comments, as well as entry to hosts-file.net - that's about it "leofelix" and writes, with reference to those comments. Accounts were blocked, so the links do not see comments.

web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:45 pm

No one knows whether what I have and fix it?

Guest

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by Guest » Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:59 pm

welcome back new_web_cassa
what about the attempted bribery?
You promised money in return of good ratings. This is why your previous accounts were banned, their posts hidden and not just because of several manipulation attempts.

Well, whilst your attempted bribery failed at myWOT, I'd like to know whether all those new accounts (which do not belong to your main account, I mean) have been paid, then.

Morevover if I remember right Hphost listed your site as a PHISH one, MysteryFCM doesn't certainly list sites because of a "scorecard manipulation attempt" at myWOT;)

<quote user="new_web_kassa">
No one knows whether what I have and fix it?
[/quote]

I'll be glad to remove my rating and comment once those new members - who joined myWOT to write positive comments on your site scorecard only - will log in again in order to modify their comments to state that you could pay them.

I'm not asking that all those accounts will have to modify their comments posted on your site scorecard, a third of those users will be sufficient.



Thanks


[edit] I cannot grant that your site scorecard will be turned into green anyway, since I do not know whether other active myWOT members rated red your site.
Ratings are not comments, comments are optional and are meant to provide some informations more

web_kassa
Posts: 546
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 3:19 pm

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by web_kassa » Wed Oct 26, 2011 8:08 pm

I have a problem with a clear understanding of what you wrote - I translated using Google Translate, the English do not know, alas, only for the programming problems:)

Explain please what you mean by (in translation) "paid for these accounts" and "that they confirm their assessment"?

On the number of positive comments - yes, you're right, it was a paid job. I tell you've done many stupid things in the past, as now, and I am sorry: (

Relatively Hphost and phishing can say is, nothing like I have never dealt with, and do not plan on - line payment online games quite profitable, and expensive in terms of entering into this business, so to lose confidence in the administration of games and even more clients to me no way!

In Hphost I brought for otstutstvie SSL, supposedly I collect information about users and I need encryption - but it is not, on the site in the form of payment only specifies the user login in the game, which is public information, and is itself payment (where the user and enter their payment information) is performed on the corresponding processing sites depending on the selected client billing system.


Guest

RE: web-kassa.com

Post by Guest » Wed Oct 26, 2011 9:04 pm

@ new_web_cassa
try to google translate "bribery", please.

I just want to make sure if those people have been really paid, at least.

In order to verify that you paid them, some of them will just have to log in to myWOT again and edit their comments on your site scorecard to add something like "The site owner kept his word" or "The owner has kept his promise".

This is the only way I have to check whether your site is not involved in some kind of fraud (even though paying people in order to get a good reputation doesn't work and is not ethical, also, in my opinion)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests