Perfect Optimizer

c۞g
Posts: 21225
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:02 am

same thing

Post by c۞g » Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:32 pm

Same thing, but a little more detailed.
spamming personal boards rather than keeping discussion in this thread.

Maybe I should just delete my comments, maintain the poor ratings...

Meh! Comments stay, others should see this thread when they come across one of these sites.

Nulander
Posts: 2136
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:09 am

---

Post by Nulander » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:12 am

> Because vendors love suing Microsoft.

Trolls never learn. Expecially if they can win and obtain a pile of money from all the war.

PS: SCO and Unix are out of this rule :PPP

-----
MF IT-UESC - Protecting your Digital Experience. Now.

MysteryFCM
Posts: 4905
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:47 pm

.....

Post by MysteryFCM » Thu Jun 17, 2010 12:46 am

I've just realised I answered the wrong question, lol. The reason they never said anything about the firewall is simply one of security, and the fact other OS's include one by default too. Put simply, Microsoft would've won that case in a heart beat.

Regards
Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group / hpHosts
it-mate.co.uk / hosts-file.net

Nulander
Posts: 2136
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 3:09 am

> Put simply, Microsoft

Post by Nulander » Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:10 am

> Put simply, Microsoft would've won that case in a heart beat.

They should have done more in order to protect more firmly their decision on the "Kernel Patch Protection", even if such problems are already handled correctly using a Limited Privilege account and, maybe, the UAC with Password request for elevation (that, must be remember could be thwarted by Social Engineering attacks, OSX/OpinionSpy docet).

-----
MF IT-UESC - Protecting your Digital Experience. Now.

MysteryFCM
Posts: 4905
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:47 pm

....

Post by MysteryFCM » Thu Jun 17, 2010 3:57 am

That's an entirely different converdation ;o)

Regards
Steven Burn
Ur I.T. Mate Group / hpHosts
it-mate.co.uk / hosts-file.net

Guest

Same here

Post by Guest » Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:17 am

with roughly the same text.

@g7w
I agree, the comments should stay on the scorecards.

Guest

error site

Post by Guest » Thu Jun 17, 2010 2:12 pm

please can you check the site advisor link?
Your posted link results in an error:
Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.

spectre
Posts: 7831
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:43 pm

weskysoft.com impersonating g7w?

Post by spectre » Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:15 pm

How low can you go???
See site advisor

Edited link above, also see weskysoft.com site advisor

spectre
Posts: 7831
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 10:43 pm

mywot.com

Post by spectre » Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:19 pm

You can also see the red rating given here mywot site advisor

Kraftwerk
Posts: 7981
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:30 pm

Re:

Post by Kraftwerk » Thu Jun 17, 2010 4:21 pm

Thats identity theft!!

Blueberrycake Level Member of the WOT Community

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests