US Homeland Security Seizing Domain Names

Post Reply
User avatar
Keavs
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:38 pm

US Homeland Security Seizing Domain Names

Post by Keavs » Sun Nov 28, 2010 4:37 am

http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/130763-homeland-security-dept-seizes-domain-names-

The US Government is seizing domain names of known counterfeit and copyright infringement sites. Just thought it was topical and would be a break from all the "serios" sticky thread talk.
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it spoken and rumored. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found in religion, or tradition Only after observation and analysis, can one decide the truth. ~Buddha (paraphrase)

Dislike (-0)

User avatar
c۞g
Posts: 10927
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:02 am

Blog

Post by c۞g » Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:30 am

Thought I seen that before...
Blog post in October: http://www.mywot.com/blog/287-beware-of-counterfeit-sports-merchandise
∞ Opto, ergo sum
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_You_and_I

Dislike (-0)

User avatar
Keavs
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:38 pm

I just find it odd

Post by Keavs » Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:50 am

I find it odd that our "Homeland Security is the one doing this.

What does it have to do with National Security or Terrorism in general. I could see the FBI or a State agency.....

I dunno, the whole Homeland Security scares me with the power it has....

As a vet and all, what do you think?
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it spoken and rumored. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found in religion, or tradition Only after observation and analysis, can one decide the truth. ~Buddha (paraphrase)

Dislike (-0)

User avatar
c۞g
Posts: 10927
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:02 am

re: Homeland Security

Post by c۞g » Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:44 am

Homeland Security has both good and bad points; as with most all bureaucratic agencies.

Some may argue in favor as an increase in monitoring terrorist functions.
Others may argue it's devise required certain limitations of Constitutional Rights which would make the term an oxymoron.

Personally, I feel it's a necessary advancement in law enforcement; times have changed and with those changes laws and their enforcing agencies need to adapt.

The Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA) S.3804 will be made law, expect it.
Senate Judiciary Committee Advances Bipartisan Bill To Combat Copyright Infringement And Counterfeits
November 18, 2010

Some domains showing the seizure image
usaoutlets.net - rated red - http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/usaoutlets.net
torrent-finder.com - rated green - http://www.mywot.com/scorecard/torrent-finder.com

Some domains seized in late June 2010: image - article

tvshack.net
movies-links.tv
filespump.com
now-movies.com
planetmoviez.com
thepiratecity.org
ninjavideo.net
ninjathis.net
zml.com
∞ Opto, ergo sum
_https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/And_You_and_I

Dislike (-0)

User avatar
mentalist3d
Posts: 813
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 11:50 pm

Out of curiousity

Post by mentalist3d » Sun Nov 28, 2010 12:40 pm

Out of curiosity, are they seizing domain names that were registered within the US, or is every domain that fits their aims and objectives fair game, even if registered outside the US?
Dislike (-0)

User avatar
Keavs
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:38 pm

I'm not sure, it's news to

Post by Keavs » Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:54 pm

I'm not sure, it's news to me, although I can't believe I didn't know.

Homeland security scares me, I have seen it abused, in the form of warrantless searches on American citizens, which resulted in a small marijuana arrest. I can't believe that is what it was created for.

I have also lost a lot in faith in leadership, and what drives the people with power in the USA.

I do believe copyright infringement need s to be dealt with.. I'm a victim myself on more than a few occasions, and it's hard to enforce, when it isn't a huge monetary loss involved. I tried to report someone to \the DMCA about use of my property... the form is long and hard, and nothing happened. Didn't even kill their search results on google.

They still are using my pictures.

mrhumbles.com/mms.html Those are my pictures on top of the page.
These guys don't answer my mail . ( Dou----bags)

I have to check Ebay every week for swiped pictures.
Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it spoken and rumored. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found in religion, or tradition Only after observation and analysis, can one decide the truth. ~Buddha (paraphrase)

Dislike (-0)

User avatar
pamrabbit
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2017 5:23 am

RE: US Homeland Security Seizing Domain Names

Post by pamrabbit » Sun Aug 06, 2017 5:41 pm

is anything new happening this topic? Does HS seize like it sounds like, legitimate peoples domain names, like what Keavs had happen, or does it try to seize mainly fake domains that are not the real site?
The Idea that Any agency that takes away constitutional rights is appalling, the founding fathers had a reason for what the said in the constitution.
have compassion for each other, Pamitty
Dislike (-0)

Site-rater
Posts: 2811
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 7:48 pm

RE: US Homeland Security Seizing Domain Names

Post by Site-rater » Sun Aug 06, 2017 6:50 pm

It is quite rare that a seizure will be for something lawful, like a popular free DNS provider, but in that particular case the government quickly returned the domain. Not sure if they scrubbed the logs illegitimately gathered through.

Some of the more newsworthy cases have been due to sites involved in facilitating copyright infringement being seized and operated by the government (the latter part being why I rate the Phishing) and the fights regarding these domains are diluting genuine concerns like legitimate data seized and held in the Megaupload raid.

Part of the reason I rate illegal websites red is due to the risk they will be seized and compromised without prior warning to their visitors.
Dislike (-0)

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest