Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 am

Post by Adominator101 » Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 am

This website is potentially unwanted so please rate low and comment. WARNING! This website had numerous pop-ups and adult content.

Posts: 1198
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:31 am


Post by Athlonite » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:00 am

I have to agree. I haven't seen anything this Sick . I guess you have to be a little deranged to resort to something like this. Although I didn't experience any pop-ups
the content IS VERY disturbing.


Your help is always needed.



Post by Guest » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:36 am

Rated it red and left a comment.

Posts: 21225
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:02 am


Post by c۞g » Sat Feb 07, 2009 2:33 pm

pr0n is pr0n...
Adult content? yup.
Popups? none for me - not on entry, or exit.
They really should employ child safety methods available.
They are within legal limits by including a Compliance Statement
This seems to be an honest business; whether or not it's content is agreeable - it proposes no malicious harm to a lurker.

I've rated the Child Safety = red and the rest is "in the middle."

I may not agree with the sites content, but that is a personal opinion based upon my own morality.

Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 12:45 pm

Several sick sites

Post by Spacequad » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:39 pm

There are several of them linking from the domain listed above. They are very disgusting. I rated each and every one of them as Adult with the lowest rating.



Post by Guest » Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:43 pm

I have rated it red also.

Posts: 1046
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:14 am


Post by Xp54321 » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:07 pm

Horribly disgusting. I've set it to be blocked with the Avast! Web Shield's URL Blocking module. I did not encounter any popups. I rated all red.

Posts: 2568
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 10:50 am


Post by cotojo » Sat Feb 07, 2009 6:07 pm

Another red rating. 3 popups on exit also posibility of phishing, I wouldn't trust it and it's just sick.
7 sites linked on main page and 15 on sidebar


I agree, but . . .

Post by Guest » Sun Feb 08, 2009 6:46 pm

g7w: " I may not agree with the sites content, but that is a personal opinion based upon my own morality."

Yes, personal opinions on morality are all over the map, and ALONE should probably not be used as criteria for rating.

But I don't know of ANY morality that would consider this stuff not malicious. Only a complete lack of even the loosest morality would consider it not malicious.

But an even larger argument to rate it completely red would be that this kind of site is a breeding ground for malware . . . especially since most people that visit these sorts of sites voluntarily are NOT security conscious (consequently malware writers know that if they deposit their malware here it is likely to be "effective" . . . IOW, they get the biggest bang for their buck at these types of sites).

While I may be speculating on the dangers of the site (I didn't hang around there to go into depth, but some others apparently did investigate it thoroughly . . . and their results bore out my thinking), I think it is a very probable speculation . . . enough for me to base a complete rating of red without going any further.

And, I would rate all porn sites completely red, not for any moral objection alone, but because, as I said, they are breeding grounds for malware and most voluntary visitors are not security conscious and hence malware finds a comfortable home on these sites.

Whether any malware found that comfortable home on this particular site, I don't know and I don't care. It may be a "legal" site, but there are a lot of malicious things that are "legal". "Legal" or "legitimate" alone doesn't make it automatically green for me.

Before I get into too much of a rant here, let me stop and point out, g7w, that I don't mean to be abrasive or abusive, and your opinions are respected and thought provoking.



Post by Guest » Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:33 am

Most of us know that a site that peddles porn is were you are most likely to get viruses according to statistics so I am with Bobjam on this one.Also a lot of the others that voted it red are experienced WOT users.But its up to a individual how they vote and thats what makes WOT different to a lot of site advisors.Human Input.A lot of legal sites also have racist or hateful comment and WOT users in the main would vote them red.WOT is multi racial and no doubt a multi religious community and a lot of people will vote on there belief system.But on the whole WOT is fairly accurate in my estimation.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests