Red Ratings for Forum Spamming!!!

[Guest]

Please rate them red for spamming Wot forum...

tnzil.com
aqartd.com
tamo7.com

Ref::: http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/10620-?comment=72024#comment-72024
Reported to Admins!!!
User got banned: : http://www.mywot.com/en/user/2262530

[Jazspeak]

I don't think that it is right to rate sites in that way. Forum spamming gets users banned and that should be enough.

Sites should be rated on content and any ratings for spamming should be based on the correct interpretation of spamming being the repeated sending of unsolicited e-mail advertising.

[siblingshot]

Agreed.

Sites ought to be rated on their merits.

If a user is banned as a result of breach of guidelines, it is punishment enough that his / her 'voice' is silenced on the forum; that they have no recourse to raise issues or objections, or to contribute in any meaningful fashion.

[Guest]

I don't think that it is right to rate sites in that way. Forum spamming gets users banned and that should be enough.
Here peoples spam and we rate their website red for forum spamming isn't it...

Sites should be rated on content and any ratings for spamming should be based on the correct interpretation of spamming
I know that we rate the website based on their content but some morons try to use marketing bots which usually post their articles and other stuff here and we rate them for forum spamming as under category of SPAM...
Many of the peoples use some Black Hat SEO technique which nothing help in good but creates a spamming reputation for website...
I hope you can see that post posted by one moron which is recently deleted by SAMI tehn it would help you more in decision...

[Guest]

If a user is banned as a result of breach of guidelines, it is punishment enough that his / her 'voice' is silenced on the forum;
Is that ok that peoples try these seo techniques after knowing all these facts...
that the bots mostly use in these techniques spam forums...

[Jazspeak]

"we rate their website red for forum spamming"

You might rates sites in that way but I do not.

"some morons try to use marketing bots which usually post their articles and other stuff here"

What evidence do you have for making that claim? I have never seen anything on this forum that looks like it came from "marketing bots", although I have seen plenty of human-generated promotional postings.

[Guest]

You might rates sites in that way but I do not.
Yes you can do as you want...But we rate those website for forum spamming...

What evidence do you have for making that claim?
Evidences how cud i have bcoz i haven't done spamming ever...Yes once when i wished here for NEW YEAR!!!

I have seen plenty of human-generated promotional postings.
I have seen too...most recent eg. http://www.mywot.com/en/forum/5258-pandora-jewelry-phishing-scam?comment=69150#comment-69150

[Jazspeak]

"Evidences how cud i have"

QED.

[Guest]

the thread was deleted by Sami so how could i show that you can ask sami...
the thread was not cached at that time...

[Tom McClelland]

Your links do not lead to any evidence that I could use to red-rate a site. So basically you're just asking members to do it on your personal say so.

From the rating guidelines:

"Rate only those sites you know"

That guideline is an important protection (if observed) against herd mentality.