I haven't used the MRT. However, I do see the value in it. I am considering it for domains like the Disney group, but I am still learning the ropes, so I am still rating one site at a time. I understand all the yelling and drama from sites that claim to be mis-rated, but I don't trust them either, a...

<quote user="NotBuyingIt"> \ @<a href="http://www.mywot.com/en/user/4639826">clipboard33</a> If you haven't already examined it, you may be interested in the beta version of WOT (<a href="http://beta.mywot.com/en/blog/441-the-new-wot-beta-is-now-released">announcement</a>). You will likely be allowe...

I prefer the option of having 2 comments. Why? I can then rate one positive and the other negative or ambiguous. Example: A site that is truly useful deserves a positive comment, but if the same site uses offensive/intrusive popups or is lousy when it comes to privacy, then that same site also deser...

Thank you Mr. Ala-Kleemola for the clarification and the fix.

The petition may be of limited value, but not speaking out at all seems like non social fatalism (i.e. become a hermit). Still, I suppose it really depends on how much you stand to lose by speaking out. It is a very personal judgement call.

No
Because I already assume I am being "watched" by the government(s), the software (MS et al) and occasionally the hacker-passerby. So, I do what I can to limit the potential/actual intrusions, and then what-the-heck, get on with my life.