Search found 69 matches

by SeanW
Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:40 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Adult "Shock" Sites:
Replies: 44
Views: 1545

Problem

Cams.com is NOT a shock site. It appears to be a regular porn site.
by SeanW
Fri Mar 12, 2010 4:51 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Unethical, Unfair, Wrong, Inaccurate, Devious, Deceptive, Misleading Ratings
Replies: 34
Views: 989

rated 4 Greens. I probably

rated 4 Greens. I probably just trashed my Reliability score in doing so, but all the yellow marks just didn't make any sense.
by SeanW
Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:01 am
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Clarification for Flagging Reviews
Replies: 31
Views: 293

In response to the OP.

I haven't read all of the posts, but I just wanted to say this: In WOT, the standard reviewing practice is to use not just technical security, but "reputation" which is the central theme, I don't know if the OP is familiar with WOTs main competitor, McAffee SiteAdvisor, but they run a similar site r...
by SeanW
Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:42 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: http://shoopdawhoop.co.uk/ -Rate RED
Replies: 15
Views: 701

Done.

Done.
by SeanW
Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:55 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Facebook.com
Replies: 17
Views: 404

I don't believe so. First of

I don't believe so. First of all, I'm reasonably sure that the 29 friends relates to Facebooker #1s profile, along with the 2 photos. I certainly did not recieve emails from 29 people inviting me to Facebook, and I highly doubt that I know 29 people on Facebook in total. You must also remember that ...
by SeanW
Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:22 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Facebook.com
Replies: 17
Views: 404

In repsonse to g7w

> If FB started to spam and scam their membership it would dwindle > that's not good business sense. And after all, they are a business. Their business is gathering personal information. And they seem to be doing it very well! > recent emails from whom? Family? Friends? Acquaintances? I've kept thei...
by SeanW
Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:34 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Facebook.com
Replies: 17
Views: 404

I don't disagree with any of

I don't disagree with any of this.

However, that is not what I was complaining about ... if you believe Facebook is a good site, please deal with the points I've actually made.
by SeanW
Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:05 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Facebook.com
Replies: 17
Views: 404

I'm sorry, that's just plain wrong.

> There is a difference between Facebook's privacy to their users and Facebook > user privacy between users. That is what the new PP takes into account. I would understand if it were just saying "OK, if you publish something like a picture, it's effectively out of your control from that point on" as...
by SeanW
Sun Mar 07, 2010 5:03 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Facebook.com
Replies: 17
Views: 404

Yes, I just read the other

Yes, I just read the other recent thread on Facebook, but taken everything into consideration, I suspect there's more to it than what's in the recent privacy settings changes. The whole package smells. There are too many indicators that something is wrong. This is one case I strong suspect of being ...
by SeanW
Sun Mar 07, 2010 4:03 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Facebook.com
Replies: 17
Views: 404

Facebook.com

Hi everyone; I wrote this post because I want everyone who reads this to rate down Facebook, at least for Privacy, my reasons for this I will explain below. I recently reconnected with some old friends from my college days and it seemed like many of them are on Facebook. One of them, my closest from...