Search found 113 matches

by Javelina
Sat Oct 18, 2014 10:56 pm
Forum: General discussion
Topic: Milestones
Replies: 13
Views: 186

RE: Milestones

<quote user="c۞g">That was posted after I posted the screen capture snippet. Well past the time when WOT reached 125M. Interesting how neither the Blog nor the FaceBook page has made any acknowledgements about the month of October, the official <a href="here" title="National Cyber Security Awareness...
by Javelina
Sun Oct 05, 2014 11:43 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: firsttoknow.com
Replies: 5
Views: 81

RE: firsttoknow.com

<quote user="firsttoknow">Thanks for your feedback, and for restating that there are no links to malware on the site. We're not quite sure where that comment came from, but it's untrue....</quote> I just rated your website, see https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/firsttoknow.com/comment-84111373 My o...
by Javelina
Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:10 pm
Forum: General discussion
Topic: Should WOT block political sites?
Replies: 17
Views: 323

RE: Should WOT block political sites?

... I do hope he gets betterMe too! It is sad. Based on his past public service, I don't think he was always as... well, ill, as he is now.

(And thank you, it is nice to be back here again!)

by Javelina
Fri Aug 08, 2014 11:52 pm
Forum: General discussion
Topic: Should WOT block political sites?
Replies: 17
Views: 323

RE: Should WOT block political sites?

I just visited the website in question. The content didn't seem especially logical. However, I rated the site <strong><green>green</green></strong>. This is why: * There are ZERO cookies set. * There is NO Google AdSense or other website analytics. Do you know how rare that is?! * There is no obscen...
by Javelina
Sun Apr 27, 2014 3:54 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: wot wont work
Replies: 30
Views: 1049

RE: wot wont work

I'm using Chrome browser version 34.0.1847.116 and Win 7. No problems with the WOT extension for me either
by Javelina
Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:39 am
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: quotestank.blogspot.com
Replies: 8
Views: 86

RE: quotestank.blogspot.com rating

You have a privacy policy. It is decent. You have a contact page, including email. You have an awful lot of tracking. Your site takes forever to load! I will trust milliem, that you removed the two malware websites. You have some errors in your quotations. Correct these on your revolution page hxxp:...
by Javelina
Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:43 am
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: CNET is no longer a credible site
Replies: 10
Views: 235

RE: CNET is no longer a credible site

<quote user="Satchman">Please see the link below to Cnet's WOT scorecard, and rate it down! We talk about the malware issues in the comment section. https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/cnet.com/comment-28908898#comment-28908898 </quote>I believe OP, that there are problems with the CNET downloader. I...
by Javelina
Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:39 am
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: CNET is no longer a credible site
Replies: 10
Views: 235

RE: CNET is no longer a credible site


You downloaded FreeKeyloggerPro and expected it not to be detected as a virus/malware?


I doubt this is anything to do with CNET, although I agree they have some bad practices.
Lol! I thought the same, about something named FreeKeyloggerPro!
by Javelina
Mon Mar 24, 2014 4:15 am
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Example dot com scorecard
Replies: 1
Views: 102

Example dot com scorecard

The domain example.com is reserved by IANA for documentation purposes, for use as an example. For some reason* it attracts mywot users to its <a href="https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/example.com">WOT scorecard</a> like moths to a flame. This creates two problems. First: <red>Example.com has 1280 ...
by Javelina
Sat Mar 22, 2014 5:55 am
Forum: General discussion
Topic: registered account proposal
Replies: 45
Views: 701

RE: registered account proposal

I just noticed this thread now. I read through to the end, and duly noted the response by our good Timo of WOT. I was satisfied with Timo's response. Of the four parts of the original proposal, Timo's post would <ul> <li> definitely make part 1 an action item, </li> <li> probably make part 2 an acti...