@lotusscrubs <strong>Here is the private message you posted to my board:</strong> (http://www.mywot.com/en/user/2169182/board/comment-422478) <cite> lotusscrubs (Bronze) 04/06/2011 10:45:11 PM(Permalink)Private (Requesting for review & rate my site) Hello, I am the owner of lotusscrubs.com. Currentl...

Heads up, Carlo, Your privacy policy looks <strong>great</strong> except, where your company name "Vita Vissuta" should be written, you have put links. Those links say "http://VitaVissuta.com", but instead the href goes to "http://carloscano.it/", which redirects to "http://www.carloscano.it/", whic...

To some extent, WOT "airs its laundry" in public, which has already provided fodder for a recently discussed anti-WOT blog. Here comes Joe user, who watches a lot of teevee, believes in majority rule, is suggestible, and just acquired a magic toolbar to guide his prejudices. When he checks out Sweet...

Nice looking beginning. You should write a privacy policy.

The domain you first gave us - "VitaVissuta.com" - redirected to "http://www.carloscano.it/vitavissuta/". This may seem suspicious to your visitors, especially with the long load time.

Perhaps we should be beating our chests just a little. After all, a few of the author's points were almost true, and were perfectly blended with copious Politician Quality slogans and fabrications. I am truly awed by such profound intellectual flatulence.

It's her. When I got lost trying to understand LKB/Aurora's WOT rating issues, I simply went to her profile and read all of her posts. The unique style of expression and presentation are nearly an exact match with "Patsy". I'm just noting this "for the record".

WinXPSP3, IE8 + WoT tb + Kaspersky URLsCheck & vKeyboard:
Elements below the rating sliders tend to shift position 1-2x, apparently on mouse-over, then stabilize.
The Agree / Disagree icons are way too transparent.
I see no other problems.
Good job on the added element title attributes.

This might be useful on a pro rata basis if the comment categories were significantly refined; however this runs the risk that complexity could degrade the impact of comments.

<em>Which scorecards have they been likely to visit? Probably not some extremely new site, or a phishing site, but to a few well-known sites</em> Good point, but I should add this. I don't run in a sand box and can't afford to get my PC trashed, so I am in the habit of looking before I leap to anywh...