Search found 2113 matches

by Myxt
Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:29 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Website Assessment
Replies: 9
Views: 210

RE: Website Assessment

Where in the WOT guidelines does it say we are rating for dumb SEO? If she spams Google, only her site ranking will suffer.
by Myxt
Sun Apr 03, 2011 7:06 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Website Assessment
Replies: 9
Views: 210

RE: Website Assessment

#1 What is a "keyword exploit" and how does it endanger visitors to blue_nexus's site? #2 Your scorecard comment is about spamming this forum, yet the "Spam" category has to do with spamming the public. Somebody correct me if I'm wrong about this. If i'm right, please amend that comment to the "Othe...
by Myxt
Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:59 pm
Forum: General discussion
Topic: Your views on advertising on websites
Replies: 8
Views: 353

RE: Your views on advertising on websites

@Swapfire
If enough people don't want to see ads, someone will write software to block them. The blocking can be enabled or disabled as the user desires. The right of free speech does not automatically grant the right to be heard or to be taken seriously.
by Myxt
Sun Apr 03, 2011 5:24 pm
Forum: General discussion
Topic: A blog to read bashing WoT
Replies: 37
Views: 1292

RE: A blog to read bashing WoT

By golly, you're right! There's the link to the About page, about 700 pixels away from the F-bomb in the actual title of the song. Maybe the kids are using netbooks with small screens and don't scroll down the page before clicking the About link.
by Myxt
Sat Apr 02, 2011 11:45 pm
Forum: General discussion
Topic: A blog to read bashing WoT
Replies: 37
Views: 1292

RE: A blog to read bashing WoT

Their point about child safety / language conflicts with their music video with the multiply repeating refrain, "God will fvck you up" <a href="http://gaytheistagenda.lavenderliberal.com/2011/04/01/god-will-bleep-you-up/"></a> Their point that "the site is not for children" is not mentioned on the f...
by Myxt
Sat Apr 02, 2011 11:13 pm
Forum: Reputation discussions
Topic: Halo Forum, why the low rating?
Replies: 2
Views: 169

RE: Halo Forum, why the low rating?

<strong>If</strong> you gave the correct domain: - the domain record was last updated in 2004, and its status is "frozen", - last rated on WOT on 2008/05/18 by exactly one WOT member who is now banned, - site front page is gutted, so it's likely not trustworthy or reliable, - but it's probably child...
by Myxt
Sat Apr 02, 2011 10:41 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: Blocking WOT ratings
Replies: 6
Views: 282

RE: Blocking WOT ratings

I went back to that site 4 times and saw no donuts. Unless you have some kind of memory leak, the only thing I can think of at the moment is they may be live testing the WOT widget -?
by Myxt
Sat Apr 02, 2011 9:51 pm
Forum: Support
Topic: Blocking WOT ratings
Replies: 6
Views: 282

RE: Blocking WOT ratings

Click the WOT tool icon on your browser > click Settings (upper right) > click the Searching tab > change what you want. But I don't see a way to add domains, probably because there's no handshaking set up yet.
by Myxt
Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:10 am
Forum: Support
Topic: When trying to post a comment the 'catagory' dropdown or whatever it is suppose to be - doesn't work
Replies: 2
Views: 240

RE: When trying to post a comment the 'catagory' dropdown or wha

Using what browser? Do you have many toolbars installed? Turn on browser script error reporting and post error message(s).
by Myxt
Fri Mar 25, 2011 4:08 am
Forum: General discussion
Topic: Fraudulent certificate issued BY COMODO ...
Replies: 27
Views: 680

RE: Fraudulent certificate issued BY COMODO ...

I read a current article in Vanity Fair about Stuxnet + Iran + stolen signatures, originally from RealTek, and later from JMicron. Could be related?