<quote user="c۞g"> <a href="https://www.mywot.com/wiki/FAQ#Ratings_vs._comments">Comments are not ratings</a> - they do NOT affect reputation which is why comments are <em>optional</em>. Voting up/down existing comments has no affect with reputation. WOT is not a democracy it is a <a href="http://en...

<quote user="th3br41n"> What votes are you talking about? You cannot see ratings, you can see only comments... Each user has her/his own RR: http://www.mywot.com/wiki/Rating_reliability </quote> what i meant to say was down rated, what i was getting as it surely other people down rated them for them...

<quote user="GURBL"> just for the record.: www.rpgcrossing.com is on 198.143.133.202. However, a flock of south african insurance spammers, sendsrv.com / mailblaze.com have infested this /24, snowshoeing across at *least* 198.143.137[.130-158]. The /19 was listed as HIJACKED back in September 2009, ...

Just thought it important to point out that NotBuyingIt is a moderator not WoT staff...dont think he gets paid either. I was in a situation like this one except mine was much much worse. My site was a business and almost all of my clients had WoT because I installed it on their computer. Only a few ...

<quote user="SuperHero58"> @ ugopvn = Greetings Your site is by proxy , which I do not trust , besides the fact of not having a privacy policy I have nephews that are minors , but use computers <red>Rated</red> Sorry ! </quote> I'm just curious about the whole downvoting for privacy/private registra...

Rated

Good luck

If you want my advice i'd recommend you edit the post removing all mentions of the website or just remove the post completely and warn them not to post a site evaluation. Theres a lot of great WoT users here that read the forums and post...but from what i've seen theres way more monsters lurking. Th...

I think the pricing of the WoT Trust seals should be reconsidered. At 29.90 € per month you're talking about $472.91 USD per year. The websites that benefit the most from the trust seal are sites that are not well established and well known which means they aren't likely to want to spend that amount...

...being aged.....what in gods name is that even suppose to mean? That the purchaser didn't let the domain expire?

Please rate based on your own opinions of the sites trustworthiness, vendor reliability, privacy, child safety and not the opinions of others.