Search found 44 matches

by RB2016
Tue Jun 14, 2016 10:05 am
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: truthly.me
Replies: 2
Views: 450

RE: truthly.me

Site is secure, no malware, no indication of foul play. The decision to only give access to facebook users is arbitrary, but no reason to vote negative.
Rated green.
by RB2016
Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:50 am
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: kunstpausen.no
Replies: 6
Views: 633

RE: kunstpausen.no

Site is still flagged by:
Fortinet: Malware site
CLEAN MX: Suspicious site

If you want to be re-evaluated, you need to clear this problem up.
by RB2016
Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:43 am
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: collezionedatiffany.com
Replies: 4
Views: 363

RE: collezionedatiffany.com

Nice site, well done. No security issues.
Rated green.
by RB2016
Mon Jun 13, 2016 3:36 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: onlinelighting.com.au
Replies: 4
Views: 313

RE: onlinelighting.com.au

Looks like a good site. I just would watch it with the popup. It appears quite quickly and some people are allergic to this kind of thing. I would suggest to delay it for at least a minute. After all, visitors must get the chance to see what your site is about before you smash a discount in their fa...
by RB2016
Wed Jun 01, 2016 8:25 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: oypla.com
Replies: 8
Views: 547

RE: oypla.com

Site is clean, company info and private policy are in place, although you mention nothing about using Google analytics, which is required. Fix that please. In fact, it is advisable to create a separate privacy policy where you explain in detail what type of cookies are used etc... I rated green but ...
by RB2016
Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:56 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: bicicletaeletrica.org
Replies: 1
Views: 123

RE: bicicletaeletrica.org

You appear to have spammed a comment box on a blog. Are you using a service to promote your site?
If you do, stop it, because this is unethical.

I also do not see any company info, nor a privacy statement.
I abstain from rating for now.
by RB2016
Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:42 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: ummys.fr
Replies: 8
Views: 186

RE: ummys.fr

Privacy statement et Terms of use sont vide. En fait, tout les liens en bas de SUBSCRIBE sont vide.
Reglez ça et je vote vert.
by RB2016
Wed Jun 01, 2016 7:32 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: cocomelody.com
Replies: 5
Views: 347

RE: cocomelody.com

According to scanner.pcrisk, you have 10 suspicious files on board. Check this report: hxxp://scanner.pcrisk.com/detailed_report/cocomelody.com#details Looks like you need to do a thorough scan of your site. For the rest, the membership system is in https, and company info is easy to find now. Not r...
by RB2016
Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:58 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: mm1movies.com
Replies: 7
Views: 199

RE: mm1movies.com

<quote user="Site-rater"> * Your website does not have HTTPS which means the password you use to log into your Wordpress installation is not protected in transit. </quote> Site-rater, I agree with most things you say but this is not a requirement. HTTPS is only required if a site has a shopping or m...
by RB2016
Wed Jun 01, 2016 6:52 pm
Forum: Site evaluations
Topic: dynahoedave.co.nf
Replies: 5
Views: 805

RE: dynahoedave.co.nf

Your site appears to be clean of malware. but you link to a site (I optimize 4 nobody) that is flagged red by McAffee antivirus under category: Malicious downloads.
Remove that link and check all others on your site to make sure you only link to clean sites.
Then I will rate your site.