trafoexperts.com

Post Reply
ugopvn
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:20 am

trafoexperts.com

Post by ugopvn » Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:20 am

Site URL: http://trafoexperts.com
Scorecard: [url=https://www.mywot.com/scorecard/trafoexperts.com t=_self]View scorecard[/url]

Introduction:
My name is Ugo Piovan, I am a power transformer consultant.

There is absolutely no "content depicting nudity, sexual content, violence, vulgar or hateful language or content that encourages dangerous or illegal activities" on my website (just check by yourselves). Therefore how could I get a low child safety score?

As for my reputation just have a look at endorsements and recommendations on my linkedin profile http://www.linkedin.com/in/ugopiovan

It looks to me that WOT is not doing a good job in screening bad rating from competitors and should be more careful before smearing other people reputations.

Has privacy policy?
No: I did not deem it necessary because

Has a way for users to contact site owners?
[url=http://www.trafoexperts.com t=_self]http://www.trafoexperts.com[/url]

Whois Information:
http://whois.domaintools.com/trafoexperts.com

Disclaimer:
This post was generated automatically. All information is as entered by the site owner.

用戶星光
Posts: 508
Joined: Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:58 pm

RE: trafoexperts.com

Post by 用戶星光 » Sun Sep 08, 2013 1:35 pm

There is absolutely no "content depicting nudity, sexual content, violence, vulgar or hateful language or content that encourages dangerous or illegal activities" on my website (just check by yourselves). Therefore how could I get a low child safety score?
Actually, not everyone rates your site. So, gray colored scorecard means not enough ratings (hence, nothing, in other words). There's no such things as "low child safety" in your website. All you need to do is "patient" and let other users evaluate it.
It looks to me that WOT is not doing a good job in screening bad rating from competitors and should be more careful before smearing other people reputations.
You may wish to check and study WOT [url=http://www.mywot.com/en/faq t=_self]FAQs[/url], [url=http://www.mywot.com/en/support t=_self]Help and Support[/url], and [url=http://www.mywot.com/en/guidelines t=_self]Guidelines[/url] before you conclude this statement.

(BTW, I haven't rate your site too)

Guest

RE: trafoexperts.com

Post by Guest » Sun Sep 08, 2013 5:31 pm

@ ugopvn =
Greetings
Your site is by proxy , which I do not trust , besides the fact of not having a privacy policy
I have nephews that are minors , but use computers
Rated
Sorry !

ugopvn
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:20 am

RE: trafoexperts.com

Post by ugopvn » Sun Sep 08, 2013 5:33 pm

Did you bother checking the site?

jcamacho
Posts: 58
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 4:11 am

RE: trafoexperts.com

Post by jcamacho » Sun Sep 08, 2013 7:06 pm

<quote user="superhero58">
@ ugopvn =
Greetings
Your site is by proxy , which I do not trust , besides the fact of not having a privacy policy
I have nephews that are minors , but use computers
Rated
Sorry !
[/quote]

I'm just curious about the whole downvoting for privacy/private registration. What aspect of his site warrants warning other members of the WoT community. What I mean is what is so important about the private registration and missing privacy policy in regards to his website?

MysteryFCM
Posts: 4912
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 4:47 pm

RE: trafoexperts.com

Post by MysteryFCM » Mon Sep 09, 2013 2:29 pm

Due to the nature of the site, the child safety rating does not apply. However, company sites aren't supposed to be hiding the registration info (as there's contact info etc on the site, it's actually a little puzzling as to why it was hidden in the WhoIs records), and should always have a privacy policy (also required by law for sites whose companies are within the EU (though the only part required by law, covers the cookies, as per the [url=http://www.ico.org.uk/for_organisations/privacy_and_electronic_communications/the_guide/cookies t=_self]EU Privacy Directive[/url])).

I've not rated the site however, nor do I intend to, but as it stands, there's no malicious or adult content anywhere on the site.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests