Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Patrick Traill
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:06 pm

Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Patrick Traill » Thu Nov 28, 2013 6:06 pm

I think that “Online tracking” should be classified as Questionable, but you have it under Positive/neutral — why?

Guest

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Guest » Fri Nov 29, 2013 8:08 am

@Patrick Traill =

Welcome to WOT, I agree and though I cannot answer your question , I will wait for the answer
I like to know the reason , as well
Best regards
Edit -
I imagine that Alternative or controversial medicine should be moved to Questionable or be removed altogether, while only for children should be worded as safe for children or minors,
Other user's opinion
repeats Good site while it could have opinions, religion, politicsIMO, the score card is evolving and should reflect these changes, though the color of the circle or doughnut, is doing a better job, in alerting people about how, we trust a site, but the moment a user goes to the score card, it becomes a bit confusing I do believe that Positive does not need to have Neutral it should simply be positive

donsorg
Posts: 4026
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:42 am

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by donsorg » Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:21 am

<quote user="superhero58">
Other user's opinion[/cite]repeats Good site
[/quote]

What version of WOT do you have? Latest versions shouldn't show "Good site" category in the "Other users' opinion" section. This was fixed several months ago.

MadMonk357
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:07 pm

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by MadMonk357 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:07 pm

Thanks for asking the question. I am new to the site and this was one thing I did not like about the program. Did you up date your version, if so, did it solve the problem?

Apollo702
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:40 pm

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Apollo702 » Sun Dec 15, 2013 12:53 am

The categories are still a mess no matter how you slice it. I finally got a response from the developers and they like it the way it is. I wonder what planet they live on???

Sami
Posts: 6987
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:43 am

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Sami » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:31 pm

<quote user="apollo702">
The categories are still a mess no matter how you slice it. I finally got a response from the developers and they like it the way it is. I wonder what planet they live on???
[/quote]

On a planet that's shared by people other than you too, and their views of the world do not necessarily match yours. Online tracking is neutral because it applies to many sites that are not questionable. For example, URL shorteners that are used for tracking clicks for ads or social media.

Guest

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Guest » Mon Dec 16, 2013 4:42 pm

<quote user="donsorg">
What version of WOT do you have? Latest versions shouldn't show "Good site" category in the "Other users' opinion" section. This was fixed several months ago.
[/quote]
I didn't see this post until now , but the one I have now is FF 26
" appears as before , but it comes with a " I disagree "
Other user's opinion repeats Good site , you could click it to disagree or just leave it alone
I am getting the impression that Mozilla wants to operate as MSN and for what its worth , some banks have not adapted to any other FF that would go beyond FF23
I could not log in to one of my accounts , and they only way I could do that was by using Internet Explorer , is off topic but it could be helpful , to anyone that goes through that problem
I was told by customer service that, they were working on the "glitch"

Apollo702
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:40 pm

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Apollo702 » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:28 am

<quote user="sami">
On a planet that's shared by people other than you too, and their views of the world do not necessarily match yours. Online tracking is neutral because it applies to many sites that are not questionable. For example, URL shorteners that are used for tracking clicks for ads or social media.
[/quote]

URL shorteners are one of the leading online risks. Furthermore, when does making- or thinking about making a purchase- require also giving away a DNA sample to be sold to the highest bidder?

Do you have any other arguments in favor of tracking better than that?

c۞g
Posts: 21225
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 4:02 am

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by c۞g » Tue Dec 24, 2013 10:06 am

<quote user="sami">Online tracking is neutral because ...[/quote]
The confusion lies in that Positive and Neutral rating categories are displayed in the same "box" So it appears that "online tracking" is a positive rating category.

IMHO there should be 4 category rating boxes:
  1. Positive
  2. Neutral
  3. Questionable
  4. Negative

Apollo702
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:40 pm

RE: Why is tracking positive/neutral?

Post by Apollo702 » Fri Dec 27, 2013 1:04 am

<quote user="c۞g">
The confusion lies in that Positive and Neutral rating categories are displayed in the same "box" So it appears that "online tracking" is a positive rating category.

IMHO there should be 4 category rating boxes:
  1. Positive
  2. Neutral
  3. Questionable
  4. Negative
[/quote]

That would definitely cut the confusion but I fear that the WOT team is stuck and they are going to dig in their heels.


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests