How to improve WOT
ucoz не индексируется
ucoz не индексируется, почему?
[img]http://sib-war.clan.su/Images/sibwar_baner.gif[/img]
[img]http://sib-war.clan.su/Images/sibwar_baner.gif[/img]
How would that improve WOT?
Mistaken thread, perhaps..?
Just a suggestion
It has occurred to me that the WOT symbol/button in the browser toolbar could show two ratings at once. For instance, an inner spot could show the personal rating of the site by the user and an outer ring could show the total rating of the site by the community (or vice versa). This would have the advantage of showing the WOT user an at-a-glance comparison of personal experience and WOT community experience, and if the WOT community decides that a previously dodgy site is now safe then the user could amend their own personal rating if they agree with the majority.
before
"recent" and "new" were implemented, you had to scan each page and look at the publish date and time.
So now.. when "new" is replaced with "recent" posts you have read would be identifiable by the post title and those unfamiliar can be identified by date and time.
The inclusion of "new" and "recent" - about a year ago - was a much needed improvement.
I think it came about because of Mischacc's threads:
[url=http://www.mywot.com/forum/3002-threaten-with-a-lawsuite-because-of-wot-comments t=_self]Threaten with a lawsuite because of WOT comments[/url]
[url=http://www.mywot.com/forum/3069-the-complete-list-of-marco-borns-sites t=_self]The complete list of Marco Borns sites[/url]
So now.. when "new" is replaced with "recent" posts you have read would be identifiable by the post title and those unfamiliar can be identified by date and time.
The inclusion of "new" and "recent" - about a year ago - was a much needed improvement.
I think it came about because of Mischacc's threads:
[url=http://www.mywot.com/forum/3002-threaten-with-a-lawsuite-because-of-wot-comments t=_self]Threaten with a lawsuite because of WOT comments[/url]
[url=http://www.mywot.com/forum/3069-the-complete-list-of-marco-borns-sites t=_self]The complete list of Marco Borns sites[/url]
testimonial reviews
WOT users are already able to leave comments on the WOT scorecards, so your suggestion is not really a way of improving WOT.
Your posting seems to suggest that you allow clients to put stuff on your site. Do you mean that those clients have FTP access to your web site files? If so then you are open to hacking, which is not a good idea.
Your posting seems to suggest that you allow clients to put stuff on your site. Do you mean that those clients have FTP access to your web site files? If so then you are open to hacking, which is not a good idea.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:16 pm
human figures
I came here to find out why the figures (or bowling pins, I thought) were more for a low-rating. Thanks for letting me know.
Suggestion for WOT: Show us what they mean; don't make us search. :>(
Suggestion for WOT: Show us what they mean; don't make us search. :>(
Can't delete?
Why you can. Click on a rating bar to on the site scorecard see two options above it. And you will see some two options: Close my rating, Delete. Pick the delete.
FasterFox and WOT
I like using the Faster Fox add-in: as I scroll down, sequential pages are loaded and I don't have to click the 'next' button. Unfortunately, if I am using a search engine, the WOT ratings only show up on the first page.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:23 pm
Me too. It's part of the job.
Me too. It's part of the job.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests