RE: Wikipedia "was" completely rewritten to say WOT doesn't exis
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:43 pm
<quote user="site-rater">... The "WOT_Services" page is semi-protected, but the POV content in the headline is still standing.
Also, perhaps someone could fill in the blanks regarding WOT Firefox for instance? Perhaps they could cite the forum? https://www.mywot.com/en/forum/76764-community-update-wot-is-back-on-firefox As the post is signed by an "Admin" account it should stand up to Wikipedia's standards.[/quote]
Hello, Site-rater. I will try to remove the POV content in the headline, but there's no guarantee it won't be reverted by other Wikipedia editors such as the ones who behaved so poorly toward OP redblade7.
Good idea, about mentioning the re-inclusion of WOT for Firefox! I can do that, and THAT will not be reverted! I will cite the entry by Mozilla itself hxxp://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/ Wikipedia does not accept forum posts as sources of information, regardless of whether or not an Admin account was the author. That's okay, as Mozilla itself (although a primary source) is sufficient. Media coverage of WOT being reinstated in the Mozilla add-on "store" would be great, as Wikipedia prefers secondary or tertiary sources of information.
If anyone happens to notice any coverage in technology or consumer Internet publications online, about WOT being made available for Firefox browser again, please post the URL here so I can cite it in the Wikipedia article too.
Also, perhaps someone could fill in the blanks regarding WOT Firefox for instance? Perhaps they could cite the forum? https://www.mywot.com/en/forum/76764-community-update-wot-is-back-on-firefox As the post is signed by an "Admin" account it should stand up to Wikipedia's standards.[/quote]
Hello, Site-rater. I will try to remove the POV content in the headline, but there's no guarantee it won't be reverted by other Wikipedia editors such as the ones who behaved so poorly toward OP redblade7.
Good idea, about mentioning the re-inclusion of WOT for Firefox! I can do that, and THAT will not be reverted! I will cite the entry by Mozilla itself hxxp://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/wot-safe-browsing-tool/ Wikipedia does not accept forum posts as sources of information, regardless of whether or not an Admin account was the author. That's okay, as Mozilla itself (although a primary source) is sufficient. Media coverage of WOT being reinstated in the Mozilla add-on "store" would be great, as Wikipedia prefers secondary or tertiary sources of information.
If anyone happens to notice any coverage in technology or consumer Internet publications online, about WOT being made available for Firefox browser again, please post the URL here so I can cite it in the Wikipedia article too.