fook.com

fook.com
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:15 am

fook.com

Post by fook.com » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:15 am

Site URL: http://fook.com
Scorecard: View scorecard

Introduction:
This domain shows on your list as "not child safe", yet there is no adult material on the site, it is a feng shui blog!

Your Mass rating system seems to poorly identify sites when the same owner has different types of sites. Can you please remove this site from your "child unfriendly" list, as it is not an honest review.

Has privacy policy?
No: Company not based in the US or Europe.

Has a way for users to contact site owners?
No: It's a blog - not a "service". If the site does not work, they are free to leave without any issues.

Whois Information:
http://whois.domaintools.com/fook.com

Disclaimer:
This post was generated automatically. All information is as entered by the site owner.

fook.com
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:15 am

RE: fook.com

Post by fook.com » Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:17 am

I want to add here: It's pretty annoying to find a site listed as "porn" when it is not. Did anyone actually visit the site or was this just another automated tool gone wild?

trying to enforce privacy policy pages and contact info on sites is sort of a hostage taking way to do things. Honest reviews of sites would be much more valuable than bulk errors, and forcing someone to change their site because of your false review is deceptive and dishonest.

31Y13
Posts: 377
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 1:52 pm

RE: fook.com

Post by 31Y13 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:03 pm

Hi,
I removed my outdated comment;

Furthermore its fact that your site were a porn site from the beginning and then changed to a feng shui site;

you write "I have owned Fook.com since 1998, continuously without interruption." fook.com/would-you-like-to-own-fook-com
Then you hosted porn and were not aware of that?

BTW it is still a porn site too; if you visit this link: fook.com/gay/ you are redirected to hiscam.com (gay porn site, which is also owned by you)

I will keep the red on child safety rating.

Guest

RE: fook.com

Post by Guest » Mon Nov 04, 2013 1:46 pm

@fook.com =
I am sorry , but you need a privacy policy a contact and a contact email , but I would like to know why you asked for a rating , when you are selling your site ?

fook.com
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:15 am

RE: fook.com

Post by fook.com » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:19 pm

<quote user="superhero58">
@fook.com =
I am sorry , but you need a privacy policy a contact and a contact email , but I would like to know why you asked for a rating , when you are selling your site ?
[/quote]

Clearly, if you are trying to sell a property (any property) you want to remove any negatives that exist for the site.

The site does not contain porn, your report is false, misleading, and could cause harm to my business. I am asking you to correct it, without requiring me to change other aspects of my site to suit you. I didn't ask for you "not child safe: review, it's dishonest to try to make me add things to my site to satisfy your needs.

fook.com
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:15 am

RE: fook.com

Post by fook.com » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:29 pm

<quote user="dim1319">
Hi,
I removed my outdated comment;

Furthermore its fact that your site were a porn site from the beginning and then changed to a feng shui site;

you write "I have owned Fook.com since 1998, continuously without interruption." fook.com/would-you-like-to-own-fook-com
Then you hosted porn and were not aware of that?

BTW it is still a porn site too; if you visit this link: fook.com/gay/ you are redirected to hiscam.com (gay porn site, which is also owned by you)

I will keep the red on child safety rating.
[/quote]

At the moment the site review was done, the site did not have any adult material on it at all - and has not had any adult material on it for almost a decade.

It is NOT a porn site, the review was false and malicious. Why would you tolerate it? Why would your system flag a domain as being an issue without having someone actually verify it?

Your site here appears to come very close to getting you into legal problems.

Guest

RE: fook.com

Post by Guest » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:38 pm

<quote user="fook.com">
At the moment the site review was done, the site did not have any adult material on it at all - and has not had any adult material on it for almost a decade.

It is NOT a porn site, the review was false and malicious. Why would you tolerate it? Why would your system flag a domain as being an issue without having someone actually verify it?

Your site here appears to come very close to getting you into legal problems.
[/quote]

I didn't ask for you "not child safe: review, it's dishonest to try to make me add things to my site to satisfy your needs.
I did not rate your site as porn , but my opinion about the site as a whole is not to be trusted , by no one and that includes my nephews , which are minors
Your opinion about me, is that, an opinion.
Which personally does not bother me one bit
Fix the issues , I mentioned before if you want a better rating
Good luck

marco2981
Posts: 2500
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 6:55 am

RE: fook.com

Post by marco2981 » Mon Nov 04, 2013 2:42 pm

<quote user="fook.com">
At the moment the site review was done, the site did not have any adult material on it at all - and has not had any adult material on it for almost a decade.

It is NOT a porn site, the review was false and malicious. Why would you tolerate it? Why would your system flag a domain as being an issue without having someone actually verify it?

Your site here appears to come very close to getting you into legal problems.
[/quote]

I didn't rate your site, but you can't say your site didn't have adult material.
You said "I have owned Fook.com since 1998, continuously without interruption"

Could you please explain this?
Oct. 13 1999 hxxp://fook.com/

"sex stories and erotic sex stories adult text and sexy story files
XXX Stories! Fetish sex Stories erotic hardcore sex stories
hot letters love sex letters text paragraphs of porn and sex"

Image


Added:
Image

I did censor pic and part of the text

fook.com
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 10:15 am

RE: fook.com

Post by fook.com » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:19 pm

<quote user="marco2981">
I didn't rate your site, but you can't say your site didn't have adult material.
You said "I have owned Fook.com since 1998, continuously without interruption"

Could you please explain this?
Oct. 13 1999 hxxp://fook.com/

"sex stories and erotic sex stories adult text and sexy story files
XXX Stories! Fetish sex Stories erotic hardcore sex stories
hot letters love sex letters text paragraphs of porn and sex"

Image


Added:
Image

I did censor pic and part of the text
[/quote]

Clearly you have issues reading. I mentioned QUITE CLEARLY that pre-2004, there was adult material on the domain.

THERE HAS NOT BEEN AN ADULT MATERIAL ON THIS DOMAIN IN A DECADE.

By your foolish logic, your drivers license and car should both be shredded because you once went over the speed limit. You know, dangerous to others once, you are ALWAYS a danger.

Privacy policies on websites are NOT a legal requirement where I live or operate from. Trying to force me to have one to get away from your posting a negative rating WITHOUT SUPPORT is pretty much getting yourself in trouble.

Can you justify your rating, or is it full of crap?

Can you show me one thing on the domain today (or any time since your "mywot" site was up that justifies as "unsafe for children" rating? I doubt it. Your rankings and ratings appear to be false, misleading, and could cause harm to my business and the business of others. Do you really want to deal with that? Either provide the supporting information that justifies your rankings, or remove them, it's pretty simple.

Guest

RE: fook.com

Post by Guest » Mon Nov 04, 2013 3:29 pm

Are you really sure your site has no adult content?

Going back to what DIM1319 said - fook.com/gay/ redirects to porn site. That's fact: your website is not safe for children.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests