Both globalresearch.ca and strategic-culture.org rated red
is quite green and should be red.
Here is another good example of why this site should be rated red
for promoting disinformation on behalf of state actors as well.
Consider another of their dodgy authors and founder, Michel Chossudovsky, an author who is listed as being a contributor to RT.com
He lists credentials as having worked for the United Nations, yet there are no records of his engagement with that organization to be found anywhere. This author recently wrote on this site that:
THAAD is not an offensive weapon, it is a type of missile defence that destroys incoming missiles only!
The U.S. media concurs: the DPRK is a threat to US national security requiring a preemptive first strike THAAD missile attack in the name of “self defense”. Who’s crazy? Kim or Trump? Never mind if it unleashes war with China and Russia.
This is simply one tiny example of misinformation, disinformation, and lies that this site fronts for.
For a more in depth review of this site's faults, you can consider the following as more objective facts:
While some of GlobalResearch's articles discuss legitimate humanitarian concerns, its view of science, economics, and geopolitics is conspiracist — if something goes wrong, the Jews West didit! The site has long been a crank magnet: If you disagree with "Western" sources on 9/11, or HAARP, or vaccines, or H1N1, or climate change, or anything published by the "mainstream" media, then GlobalResearch is guaranteed to have a page you will love.
Feel free to [url=https://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/globalresearch.ca#view t=_self]leave a rating for this large clearing-house of misinformation and lies here[/url].