kamagranow

Guest

-

Сообщение Guest » Пн сен 06, 2010 3:25 pm

Edit - http://coiro.biz.tc/zolpidem/ambien-vs-zolpidem-tartrate.htm . I went to the site , and NOW has a 404 error . the Red Stays . the last time I was swayed to rate green , it proved a mistake . thank you G7W , but no -- I did visit the place -
coiro.biz.tc/kamagra-oral-jelly/kamagra-uk.html . -------- b/w I forewarned Jasspeak not to address me at all , if there is a person from which nothing can be learned is him --- so stay away from me indirectly or directly - you offended my people , and my country but I am not interested in any explanation , enough harm you have done to people , who are truly professionals , and work the butts off -- so do not reply just echo your way out my posts

Guest

re: off topic

Сообщение Guest » Пн сен 06, 2010 3:37 pm

I, at least, want to hear what BOTH of you have to contribute on the topic. Whatever started this disagreement is not apparent to other visitors arriving at this thread. That's a good reason to consider letting it die, or at least discussing it privately instead of in a forum thread.
Echo that; I couldn't have said it better myself

c۞g
Сообщения: 21225
Зарегистрирован: Пн янв 05, 2009 4:02 am

re: he could be fictional

Сообщение c۞g » Пн сен 06, 2010 3:39 pm

If the doc isn't noticeable on the Net, how did this single business entity come to find him to be their sole physician?
It's not like Malta is a [url=http://www.bing.com/maps/?v=2&cp=29.302000254392624~46.76249999552965&lvl=3&sty=r&rtp=pos.35.933000296354294_14.381000250577927_Malta___e_~pos.22.671000212430954_79.14399974048138_India___e_&mode=D&rtop=0~0~0~ t=_blank]walk across the street[/url] to India.

The other "point" would be a physician's license is not valid globally; the site and it's reach would need to be restricted to the area the doctor could legally practice.

Guest

Whether prescription drugs

Сообщение Guest » Пн сен 06, 2010 4:03 pm

Whether prescription drugs online are legal or not is immaterial to this argument.
I disagree with you. It is relevent to save those from phishing scams or major health issues related to bad drugs.

Many people turn to generic "Viagra" as I did after getting a prescription from there GP because of the exorbitant price of Pfizers offering.
Perhaps but surely it is safer to use legally registered sites that are authorised to sell drugs cheaper than Pfzers than risk your life and financial status with those that do not adhere to the rules?

olyman
Сообщения: 15
Зарегистрирован: Сб сен 04, 2010 3:40 pm

Ill informed comment

Сообщение olyman » Пн сен 06, 2010 4:13 pm

For the record the site I referred to is kamagranow.co.uk.
The point I was trying to make is that the so called ratings are not based on knowledge but prejudice.
Whether prescription drugs online are legal or not is immaterial to this argument. Like it or not people are buying drugs online and to lump a long established supplier in with the numerous dodgy ones does a disservice to the people WOT is supposedly trying to protect.
Many people turn to generic "Viagra" as I did after getting a prescription from their GP because of the exorbitant price of Pfizers offering. Kamagra is produced by Ajanta Pharma a large Indian pharmaceutical company.
I repeat, to rate Kamagranow as "very poor" for trustworthiness, vendor reliability and privacy is nonesense as anyone who has used them could testify. If it is considered unethical then there should be no rating not a fictitious one.

Jazspeak
Сообщения: 7295
Зарегистрирован: Пт окт 17, 2008 4:20 pm

Re: "considered unethical"

Сообщение Jazspeak » Пн сен 06, 2010 4:19 pm

@ olyman

If a site is considered by the majority to be unethical then it follows that the site will be considered untrustworthy by that majority. Of course, the perception of ethics will be different in different cultures but in WOT it is the majority that has the final say in whether or not a site is unethical, and therefore untrustworthy.

olyman
Сообщения: 15
Зарегистрирован: Сб сен 04, 2010 3:40 pm

iss

Сообщение olyman » Пн сен 06, 2010 4:21 pm

As before you have completely missed the point.
By all means protect against phishing scams and bad drugs You don't do that by a blanket condemnation.

olyman
Сообщения: 15
Зарегистрирован: Сб сен 04, 2010 3:40 pm

iss By all means protect

Сообщение olyman » Пн сен 06, 2010 4:32 pm

iss
By all means protect against phishing scams and bad drugs You don't do that by a blanket condemnation.

Jazspeak
What is the point of a majority voting out of ignorance. How can you vote on trustworthiness, vendor reliability and privacy with no first hand knowledge? Surely the point of WOT is to rate on knowledge not hearsay, prejudice or what you read in the Daily Mail.

Jazspeak
Сообщения: 7295
Зарегистрирован: Пт окт 17, 2008 4:20 pm

Re: "voting out of ignorance"

Сообщение Jazspeak » Пн сен 06, 2010 4:58 pm

@ olyman

Since you have no way of knowing who is "voting" (other than those on this forum openly admitting to "voting") or how they are "voting" (again, except for those who openly give their ratings on this forum) then you have no basis for assuming that the majority is "voting out of ignorance".

Personally, I have not rated the site because I have not visited it, and have no wish to do so. However, I do know enough about the rating-habits of WOT members, such as g7w, to know that they would be very unlikely to misrate the site out of ignorance, and those members are most certainly not swayed by what they might read in any newspapers, including the Daily Mail.

Dutch Mountain
Сообщения: 2801
Зарегистрирован: Ср май 12, 2010 5:20 pm

Extensions shut

Сообщение Dutch Mountain » Пн сен 06, 2010 5:48 pm

On the extensions dot - org and dot - info you will now get 404 not found.
This is new, cause there is already a red WOT warning which must have been made before

Ответить

Кто сейчас на конференции

Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и 3 гостя